It’s essential to respond effectively when a crisis strikes, but what happens after the crisis seems to be over can be a greater risk to reputation and financial security.
Welcome to Rothstein Publishing!
When business leaders develop a legal strategy, why are many now prioritizing protecting brand and reputation rather than success in court or a negotiated settlement? And why are they still not making proper use of communication professionals?
You know you’re having a bad day as a crisis manager in the food industry when you’re facing a deadly food poisoning outbreak.
Should the CEO agree to participate in what is certain to be a negative interview? While every circumstance is different, a useful first step when asked for an interview should not be “What shall we say?” but “Shall we say anything?” That key question just could save a lot of pain.
As the war in Gaza drags on, many organizations find themselves facing the question: Should we make a statement? And what is the price if we say nothing?
New revelations brutally expose how a company ignored long-standing warning signs in pursuit of profit, leading to a costly financial and reputational crisis.
Companies have struggled for years whether to speak out on controversial social and political issues.
The sound you can hear across the big end of town is the shredding of reputations in the wake of corporate crises, often triggered by moral blindness.
When a reputational crisis strikes it’s very human to look for a quick fix. But the problems now facing Qantas are a vivid lesson for companies everywhere.
Australia’s decision to ban all non-prescription vapes highlights how lobbyists and activists sometimes misuse data in an attempt to influence major public issues.